Anne Curtis has been taking a beating in social media (where her fans have been mightily defending her) in the aftermath of her follow-up headlining concert.

Much of the criticism thrown her way has to do with her “audacity” to pass herself off as a bona fide singer. This is especially true in a country of singers where no less than Miss Saigon herself, Ms Lea Salonga, once said it’s difficult to perform.

I confess. I had “liberal” guilt as I was thinking about the public reaction to Anne.

As a former chain smoker (it’s been well over a decade since I last puffed my last stick), I would certainly be a 6 on a 7-point scale on the conservative-liberal spectrum. This is why I have no issue with people who light up, even if studies have conclusively proven cigarettes are harmful. You’re an adult, you just have to accept the consequences of your choices.

Other Stories

Maraming klase ng luha. May luhang self-serving. May luha ng inang nawalan ng anak dahil sa baril ng ‘alagad ng batas’.

The Filipino theater legend lets us in on how her wax figure is made, and how much having her own ‘double’ means to her

Although the concert was supposedly held ‘at no cost to the government,’ social media users still can’t help but wonder how much this celebration cost Filipino taxpayers

As long as (1) one accepts the consequences if anything untoward happens and (2) as long as the only “victim” is yourself, then you can smoke for all I care.

The Anne Curtis scenario

The reason my ‘liberal’ guilt came up is that, in the Anne Curtis scenario, she satisfies all those points.

First, I think it’s clear with how she calls herself or her events – “Anne-bisyosa” (a play on ambisyosa or ambitious, with her name worked into it) or “Anne-kapal” (playing off ang kapal or having a thick hide), that she doesn’t think of herself as a singer.

If anything, she actually uses the self-denigration card to charm her fans, and they eat it up.

She can’t sing, her fans know it, and they’re willing to cough up P5,000 to see her prove that she can’t sing. Her own fans have dubbed her “The Noise of the Philippines.”

She didn’t strap me down and force me to watch her concert.

The people who watched her concert used their own money, they didn’t take it out of my wallet.

True, as a financial advisor, I would rather they put the P5,000 to better use – in their savings or investments – but all I can do is advise, the decision still falls on the individual.

If you think of her as a comical act rather than a serious singer, I don’t think even her critics will object to her having a concert every night. With her concert reportedly sold out, I’m sure the producers are raring to mount her next concert as we speak. (WATCH: Anne Curtis in ‘Blood Ransom’)

The future

But will this be the future of music for this country, the way our film festivals have gone?

Every year, come December, when the Metro Manila Film Festival rolls around, we seem to have the same question collectively: this is the best we can come up with?

A warrior whose legacy has been passed from father to son (and incidentally, both father and son have become senators in real life); something about a fairy being okay; a kid who starred in a giant-commercial-masked-as-a-film that supposedly trumped the earnings of Spider Man.

Film critics and blogs have a field day when the roster for the film festival is announced; but every year, the defense of the producers is the same: this is what people want to see. This is what people pay to see.

We have to make a living, so stop giving us grief about artistic standards and integrity.

What we are willing to spend money for is a reflection of what we value.

And when people willingly give money to watch a film on its’ tenth incarnation, or P5,000 to hear a non-singer, on the pretext that “we came here to be entertained!”

How does that reflect on the kind of standards we have as a nation?

Fans of these entertainers claim that the critics are being too high-brow, elitist, snobby.

Is it any wonder why we also don’t demand better credentials for our politicians? Or why so many entertainers are now in political posts?

And why there are interviews where, when voters are asked why they voted an entertainer, their responses fall into two categories: “guwapo kasi” (he’s good looking) and “kasi pinagtatanggol niya ang mahihirap, tulad ng pelikula niya.” (He will champion the poor, like in his films.)

We keep wishing for a more educated electorate, one that will be discerning and more critical in their decision making. I don’t see that happening when what we get is a steady diet of lunchtime variety shows with gyrating dancers in skimpy wear, with audience members waiting to be called in order to humiliate themselves on national television to earn a little money.

Did I say earn? I meant win.

Yes, Anne doesn’t call herself a singer. What leaves me worried is, given her concert receipts, what this means for those who are actual singers. – Rappler.comThe article is originally published in the author’s blog here.

iSpeak is a parking space for ideas worth sharing. Share with us your ideas: [email protected]. 

The views expressed by the writer are his/her own and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of Rappler.

Got comments, questions, or insights about this piece? Download the Rappler Communities app for iOS, Android, or web, tap the Community tab, and join any of our chat rooms. See you there!