Fans of the hit show **“It’s Showtime”** were shocked by the news that one of the veteran MCs would no longer appear on the show. This was a big shock to those who were familiar with his hosting and style on stage.

According to many sources, this MC has **not appeared in many consecutive episodes**, sparking rumors of being removed from the show or having internal conflicts. Initially, many people thought this was just a temporary break, but now, it seems that the decision to leave has been official.

The absence of this MC immediately raised many questions from fans: **Is there a conflict with the crew or management? Or is this just a change in the MC lineup?**

Some information suggests that this departure is related to changes in the station’s policies, as they are looking to innovate the show to attract more viewers. However, there are also rumors that this MC has personal problems or wants to focus on other projects besides “It’s Showtime”.

Some loyal viewers expressed disappointment, thinking that the show will no longer maintain its familiar atmosphere without one of its veteran faces. However, the production team has yet to make an official announcement about the real reason behind this absence.

As soon as the news spread, the online community had strong reactions. Many expressed **regret** and wished to see this MC return. Others were curious about the real reasons behind this unexpected departure.

On social networks, many comments expressed **confusion**:

– *“What happened? Why did one of the legendary MCs leave the show without an explanation?”*
– *“Unbelievable! Without this person, ‘It’s Showtime’ will not be the same.”*
– *“We deserve to know the truth! Is there a conflict?”*
With this change, many people are curious to see how the show will adjust to continue attracting audiences. Will there be a new MC to replace or will the current lineup continue to carry the show without adding anyone?

In the near future, the relevant parties may officially speak out about this issue. But whatever the reason, it is clear that **the departure of this veteran MC is a big loss for the show and its fans**.

MTRCB suspends “It’s Showtime!”
The Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) on Monday ordered the suspension of the live noontime program “It’s Showtime!” for twelve (12) airing days.

The decision comes following multiple complaints from viewers over the July 25 episode of the show’s segment “Isip Bata” where the program’s hosts allegedly acted in an indecent manner.

The case was then referred to the MTRCB’s Hearing and Adjudication Committee which heard the case and required the respondents to submit their position papers, following a procedural process.

In accordance with the Presidential Decree (P.D.) No. 1986 (MTRCB Charter), the respondents may file one Motion for Reconsideration (MR) within fifteen (15) days after receipt of the decision. Should the Board’s Decision be adverse to the respondent’s MR, they may appeal to the Office of the President within fifteen (15) days from the receipt of the decision on the MR. This is not the first time that a preventive suspension order was imposed on It’s Showtime.

In 2010, the MTRCB imposed a 20-day preventive suspension on the variety program then called “Showtime.”

For this year, the MTRCB said it has received multiple complaints which the Board has given due course.

Most recently, the Board issued two (2) additional warnings to the noontime show concerning the following cases:
Case no. 1: Inappropriate utterance of the word “G Spot” by hosts Jhong Hilario and Vice Ganda, during the 24 January 2023 episode of “It’s Showtime!” in violation of Section 2 (B), Chapter IV of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Presidential Decree (P.D.) No. 1986.

Decision: The Board found the Respondents (ABS-CBN Corporation Broadcasting Network [ABS-CBN], ZOE Broadcasting Network, Inc. [ZBNI] and TV 5 Network, Inc.) remiss in the performance of their respective functions and duties required under the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of P.D. No. 1986, specifically Section 2 (B) Chapter IV thereof, and are admonished to refrain from making any utterances of similar nature for the same will be dealt more severely.

Case no. 2: Inappropriate utterance of the word “Tinggil” by host Vhong Navarro, during the 03 June 2023 episode of “It’s Showtime!” in violation of Section 2 (B), Chapter IV of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of P.D. No. 1986.

Decision: Derelict in the performance of their respective functions and duties under the IRR of P.D. No. 1986, Respondents (ABS-CBN and ZBNI) were sternly warned by the Board that a similar utterance will be dealt with more severely.

At present, the noontime show has duly submitted their MRs for the above-mentioned cases which are currently pending with the MTRCB’s Adjudication Committee.

It may also be recalled that the noontime show received prior warnings from the Board in relation to the utterance of the word “Pek Pek Shorts” in the January 9, 2023 episode of the show and the indecent attire and performance of Kim Duenas in the “Girl on Fire” segment aired on February 14, 2023, in both cases.

The respondents were admonished that similar violations shall be dealt with more severely.

Dismissed Complaints over lack of Merit

Apart from these, the MTRCB has received multiple complaints regarding the noontime show, which the Board dismissed in the spirit of fairness and equity, such asfollows

Complaints regarding the “Rampanalo” segment money game where hosts were paired together to catch play money using their lips;
Complaints regarding the allegedly suggestive “macho” dancing in one of the show’s segments;
Complaints regarding the wardrobe malfunctions or “nip slips” of one of the performers, to which MTRCB issued a memorandum urging stakeholders to exercise prudence in securing their talents’ clothing during performances;
Complaints of alleged inappropriate wearing of the Barong Tagalog of one of the Hosts, to name a few.

The MTRCB only adjudicates cases which, to the Board’s judgment, have basis in law and its mandate, P.D. No. 1986.