Fajardo Isn’t Versatile Enough to Fit Modern Teams: A Growing Debate in the PBA
June Mar Fajardo, one of the most dominant forces in the history of the Philippine Basketball Association (PBA), has long been known for his size, strength, and skill in the paint. His rebounding, shot-blocking, and low-post moves have made him an almost unstoppable presence on the court. With multiple MVP titles and a reputation as one of the most accomplished big men in PBA history, Fajardo’s dominance is unquestioned. However, as the game of basketball continues to evolve, a growing debate has emerged: Is Fajardo’s lack of versatility preventing him from fully adapting to the demands of modern teams?
The Changing Landscape of Basketball
In today’s basketball world, there is an increasing emphasis on speed, versatility, and the ability to stretch the floor. The rise of the three-point shot, faster transition play, and the ability to switch on defense are all key components of modern basketball. Teams are moving away from traditional big men who only dominate in the paint, and instead, they are looking for players who can contribute in multiple areas of the game. This shift has made the question of Fajardo’s adaptability even more relevant.
While Fajardo’s interior dominance remains a major asset, critics argue that his traditional style of play might not be enough to keep up with teams that rely heavily on perimeter shooting, fast breaks, and switching defensive schemes. As more teams prioritize players who can stretch the floor with three-point shooting and play with a faster tempo, Fajardo’s lack of ability to consistently score from beyond the arc or participate in up-tempo systems has led some to question whether he fits into the modern game.
Dominance in the Paint: Fajardo’s Strength
Fajardo’s strength lies in his size and his ability to control the paint. His imposing figure allows him to dominate the boards, protect the rim, and score efficiently around the basket. For years, San Miguel Beermen has built its offense around Fajardo’s presence in the low post, making him the centerpiece of their attack. His consistent double-doubles and leadership on both ends of the floor have propelled his team to numerous championships.
However, while this style has led to significant success in the past, there is increasing concern that Fajardo’s physical dominance alone may not be enough to keep up with the changing dynamics of modern basketball. As the pace of the game accelerates and teams increasingly emphasize outside shooting, Fajardo’s more traditional skill set might be seen as a limitation rather than an asset.
The Versatility Factor: A Growing Demand
One of the defining characteristics of modern basketball is versatility. Today’s top players are expected to contribute in various areas—whether it’s creating plays off the dribble, defending multiple positions, or scoring from the perimeter. The ability to shoot from beyond the three-point line has become a crucial part of a player’s skill set, especially for big men who need to stretch the floor to keep opposing defenses honest.
This is where Fajardo’s game comes under scrutiny. Unlike some of his peers in the PBA who have adapted to the modern style by incorporating perimeter shooting or improved ball-handling skills, Fajardo has largely stuck to his strengths as a dominant inside presence. While he is still an exceptional rebounder and shot-blocker, his inability to consistently contribute to the team’s outside shooting or to run the floor in transition limits his versatility.
Teams are looking for players who can contribute both in the post and from the perimeter, and some argue that Fajardo’s lack of range makes him less valuable in the modern PBA. With more teams prioritizing small-ball lineups and players who can space the floor, Fajardo’s more traditional role as a back-to-the-basket big man may not align with the evolving needs of the league.
Fajardo’s Legacy: Can He Adapt?
Some believe that, even as the game becomes more perimeter-oriented, Fajardo’s size and skill set will still allow him to be a force. Others argue that for Fajardo to maintain his position as one of the top players in the league, he will need to diversify his game—whether by improving his shooting range, developing a quicker transition game, or adding more versatility to his offensive and defensive skills.
In the end, the debate over Fajardo’s place in modern basketball reflects a larger trend in the evolution of the game itself. While his traditional style has served him well for much of his career, the future of basketball is rapidly shifting toward more versatile, multi-dimensional players. Whether Fajardo can evolve with it, or whether he remains a traditional force in the paint, will determine his role in the PBA’s future. For now, his legacy as one of the league’s greatest remains undeniable, but the question of versatility will continue to be a point of contention in discussions about his place in the modern era of basketball.